|
Opposition Leader Roger Grimes says he cannot understand
why government claims to want to promote employment equity yet is refusing
to provide equity to former nurses union presidents in Bill 63, even though
it would incur no cost to the government.
"Government has introduced a Bill that will benefit only one individual
while there are several others who should be treated the same way," said
Grimes. "The changes to the Pensions Act will allow the current nurses union
president to buy pension years retroactively to 1996 when she took the
position. Government refuses to allow other former presidents to avail of
the same benefits, even though there is zero cost to government.
"There is no cost to government since the full cost is
borne by the individual and the union, leaving no reason not to extend the
same option to other former presidents. Presidents of other unions have had
the same pension options for many years."
Grimes is surprised with the refusal of government to
extend the benefits to others given the comments of the Minister of Human
Resources, Labour and Employment to the Supreme Court ruling on pay equity.
"Minister Burke, who is also responsible for the Status of Women, stated
yesterday in the legislature that government would like to provide
retroactive pay equity but are simply not in the financial position to do
so. When I debated this Bill last night and outlined how it would be of no
cost to the taxpayer, government still refused to make any changes. As a
matter of fact, Ms. Burke left the legislature and refused to participate in
the debate.
"They refuse to provide equity to several individuals,
all but one of whom is a woman, simply because they don’t want to admit they
made a mistake when drafting the Bill.
"I intend to continue to raise this issue in the
legislature and put forth an amendment to allow all past nurses union
presidents to avail of the same pension options. Government’s stand on
equity is a double standard and I intend to hold them accountable." |