|
Opposition Leader Roger Grimes is in disbelief after hearing recent
statements made by Placentia-St. Mary’s MHA Fabian Manning. Mr. Manning is
attempting to blame the former government for decisions, or lack thereof,
that his government is making with regards to the Voisey’s Bay project.
Grimes was responding to a situation developing in the Placentia area
which may see a $7 Million steel fabrication contract between split between
a Newfoundland and Labrador firm and a Nova Scotia firm. According to
Manning, this decision could cost the Argentia area a steel fabrication
plant and the associated 30 to 40 jobs.
"If Minister Byrne and Premier Williams were committed to receiving
the full benefits agreed to in the Voisey’s Bay Development Agreement,
they would realize that there are several sections in the Industrial
Employment Benefits Agreement that would ensure this work would not go
elsewhere," said Mr. Grimes. "It is obvious that this government
is not committed to achieving the significant benefits that should accrue to
the people of the province. Is this government concerned now, after
reviewing the agreement as a government, that the Voisey’s Bay agreement
is good for the province and that it will make them look like fools for
voting against it? If this is the case, they should absolutely be ashamed of
themselves."
"This government while in Opposition continuously criticized our
government for not delivering enough benefits. Now that they have the
opportunity to do something about this situation, they are being coy,
hypocritical and passive on enforcing benefits agreements. It is an absolute
disgrace that this government claims to be heading in a direction to create
new opportunities and benefits for this province, while they cannot keep
their own caucus happy with their decisions.
"If Mr. Manning wishes to criticize, I suggest he criticize his own
government. I direct him to Articles 4.3.2 and 6.1.1 of the Industrial
Benefits Agreement before he meets with Minister Byrne again. Maybe then he
will be prepared to make a case for his constituents, instead of listening
to the defeatist attitude of the Mines and Energy Minister."
|