"The timing of this appointment is questionable," said Parsons. "Mr. Browne was near completion of his work on the Hydro General Rate Application and obviously has the best expertise at this time to complete the work on behalf of consumers of this province. To rush a decision to appoint a new advocate to complete this file is an irresponsible use of taxpayers money. I am not questioning the abilities of Mr. Johnson at this time, but it is obvious that he will now have to spend time learning a file that Mr. Browne is quite familiar with already.

"I would like to know what reason government had for terminating the services of Mr. Browne at this point in time. He has been the face of consumers on energy related issues for almost ten years and has done an admirable job. Why do we need a new advocate? Is government terminating Mr. Browne’s appointment for political reasons?"

The Liberal MHA is very concerned with the precedent being set with this appointment. The firm Mr. Johnson is associated with is that of Premier Williams’ brother. "This is not just a conflict of interest, this is nepotism. The government is clearly in a compromised position by making this appointment. I am very concerned about where things might be headed in the future for this government if they are willing to go to such lengths."

Parsons also believes the wording of the government news release is indicative of how this administration operates. "To suggest the consumer advocate acts on behalf of government is irresponsible. The consumer advocate conducts research, attends hearings and speaks out on behalf of consumers, not the minister or the government."