|
|
|
|
News
Release
Office
of the Official Opposition |
|
|
Liberals call for task force on school bus safety
Sweeney wants immediate action to ensure child safety
February 23, 2005
|
|
Opposition critic for Government Services George Sweeney, is calling on the
provincial government to put in place a task force on school bus safety and
to take immediate action to ensure that children are safe when being
transported to and from school. "We asked question on this issue in the
last session of the House of Assembly, however, and since then the Auditor
General’s Report has been released and provided further evidence which
justify immediate actions being taken to ensure the safety of children
traveling on school buses," said Sweeney. "There is also a need for a more
comprehensive review of government policy in relation to school bus safety
and a task force on the issue would accomplish this goal."
The task force, Sweeney suggested, should involve representatives of
school boards, school bus operators, school councils, the Department of
Education, the Department of Government Services and other groups involved
in this issue. The Task Force should have the necessary resources to
investigate and make recommendations.
The Liberal MHA also suggested that the mandate of the task force should
be to consider and make recommendations on a variety of issues concerning
school bus safety. He believes a terms of reference for the task force
should be drafted to consider such issues as inspection practices, the
establishment of clear standards for service delivery to be adhered to by
school boards, the use of child booster seats, the possibility of installing
seat restraints on school buses, the contracting out of bus services and the
safety implications of various delivery models. Sweeney also believes a
review of other issues should be considered, including enforcement measures
which could be imposed for non-compliance with regulations on school bus
safety, school bus driver training requirements, and a review of school bus
safety practices in other jurisdictions.
"The task force should prepare an interim report with recommendations
before the beginning of the next school year so some recommendations can be
implemented as soon as possible. If more time is needed to investigate other
issues, the task force should be given until the end of the year to make its
final report. The overall issue here is that problems have been identified
and government has to dedicate the necessary resources to ensure the safety
of children who depend on the school bus transportation system."
|
|
Media Contact:
Darrell Mercer
Director of Communications
Office of the Official Opposition
709-729-6151 or 709-687-0477 |
*Note: Mr. Sweeney will be available in his St. John’s office
for interviews at mid-day or otherwise via telephone all day. |
|
Backgrounder
School Bus Safety Issues
Responsibility for school bus safety is spread over two
government departments. The Department of Education is
responsible for setting general policy directions for the Boards
and the Department of Government Services is responsible for
administering all legislation respecting vehicles and driver
licencing. The Department of Government Services is responsible
for setting the standards and performing inspections and other
enforcement activities related to school bus safety.
Though school boards provide school bus transportation in
this province by either operating school buses themselves or by
contracting out the service, it is the government that is
ultimately responsible for budget allocations, policy and
overall monitoring of the system. For this reason, it is
government that has to take the lead in ensuring the safety of
the approximately 55,000 students being transported by school
buses in this province.
There are over 1,000 school buses currently operating in this
province. Two thirds of these (694) are owned by private
contractors and the other one third (350) are owned by school
boards. Buses are required to be inspected twice yearly at
official inspection stations and are usually inspected once a
year by MVD inspectors.
The response by government to the points made in the Auditor
General’s Report do not adequately address issues related to
school bus safety. No clear time lines have been established and
the approach does not indicate the degree of urgency required on
this matter. There is no indication that funding will be
allocated by government to make the needed improvements.
Areas of Concerns
The fact that 70% of the buses are 10 years old or older.
This large number of older buses is likely to present
serious safety challenges. Of the 694 privately owned buses,
593 are more than 10 years old.
While there are 205 official inspection stations licensed
in the Province to inspect school buses, 43 are operated by
school bus contractors. The system allows contractors and
school boards to perform inspections on their own buses.
The Auditor General expressed concern about the high
incidence of defects identified during school bus
inspections conducted by the Motor Registration Division.
Defects related to brakes, steering, mechanical and other
safety problems. As a result of the inspections in
2002-2003, 1130 defects were identified and 172 school buses
(16% ) were taken out of service.
Also, the Auditor General noted that these were not
surprise inspections, instead operators had been given
advanced notice of upcoming inspections. Despite the twice a
year inspections at the official inspection stations, a
significant number of serious defects were being identified.
The Auditor General said: "Given the extent of school
buses being taken out of service, it is likely that
regardless of MVD’s inspection efforts, there are school
buses on the Provinces highways that do not meet the
required safety standards."
Suggestions for immediate action by the Department of
Government Services
Surprise inspections for school buses should be conducted
to supplement the regular inspection schedule.
Ensure that the school bus inspection process is
adequately documented with Official Inspection Stations
being required to note in the inspection form whether each
inspection item is accepted or rejected. Also, these
inspection forms should be signed by the person conducting
the inspection.
The Department should ensure that all equipment used to
inspect school buses meet the manufacturers recommended
specifications. This was a problem in terms of the brake
meter used to assess breaking efficiency in the past.
The Department should ensure that Official Inspection
Stations have their licences renewed and meet the
requirements of annual inspections which are required for
such stations.
Suggestions for immediate action by the Department of
Education
Set out employment and training requirements for school
bus drivers.
Require school Boards to check the criminal records of
all bus drivers and the Department should outline what would
constitute an unacceptable criminal record.
Assist school boards in developing policy and procedures
manuals that outline the responsibilities of the various
parties involved with the transportation of students
including the students, parents/ guardians, bus drivers and
school staff.
Require first aid certification for all drivers.
Require bus drivers to take driver safety courses
including aspects such as dealing with inappropriate child
behavior.
Require school boards to implement a school bus safety
program which includes classroom instruction related to
school bus safety, school bus boarding and unloading drills.
Review the rates paid to private operators to ensure an
acceptable amount is paid to allow reasonable allowances for
repairs and bus replacement.
|
|
Media Contact:
Jeff Mackey
Office of the Official Opposition
709-729-6427 |
| |
|