House of Assembly
Newfoundland and Labrador

Oral Questions
December 1, 2008

HomeIn the House | Question Period

MS JONES:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

My questions are for the Minister of Finance.

Since August, eight of the ten provincial jurisdictions in this country have already had enough confidence in their economic information to release financial updates. The ninth province, New Brunswick, has already outlined their timetable as to when they will make their announcement and also put a plan in place for the economy.

Mr. Speaker, in Newfoundland and Labrador we have only seen bits and pieces of information and I guess a lot of that has been conflicting, depending upon the audience that government was addressing on any given day, whether they were people in collective bargaining or people outside. Mr. Speaker, I would like to ask the minister today: When are they going to release the vital economic information and data for Newfoundland and Labrador? Because it is imperative that the business community and the public have that information.

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Finance and President of Treasury Board.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. KENNEDY: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I thank the Opposition Leader for her question, but what is imperative is that we continue to run this Province as we have been doing over the last number of years and try to fix up the mess that was left by the Liberals when we took power in 2003.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. KENNEDY: Essentially what we are doing, Mr. Speaker, we have consulted with experts throughout the country, locally and nationally, as to how this economic crisis should be addressed. We are taking the steps that are suggested, the first being to maintain and keep spending money on infrastructure, which we are doing and which will be outlined in the economic update. Secondly, Mr. Speaker, to create employment and to continue to create employment which will give people money to spend.

We take this situation very seriously, Mr. Speaker, and the economic update that will come forward in the next week or two will outline how we plan to address the situation. The advice that has been given to us, and the advice that we are following, is to maintain the course and steady as she goes.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Mr. Speaker, maybe I should remind the minister that the have status that this Province finds themselves in today is to a large degree because of the deals that were negotiated by previous Liberal governments and Liberal premiers, I say to you, Minister, and that cannot be ignored in the economic –

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Oh, oh!

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Mr. Speaker, the Province and the minister has had months to prepare this vital economic information to gather the opinions of the leaders in the business community.

I would like to ask the minister today: Have you met with the leadership in Newfoundland and Labrador? Have you consulted with the business community, and do you have a handle on where the industry sectors are going?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Finance and President of Treasury Board.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. KENNEDY: Perhaps, Mr. Speaker, I remind the Leader of the Opposition, if she would stop giving speeches and ask questions I could specifically address it.

Let me remind you of a couple of basic facts. When we took power in 2003 there was a $12 billion debt and a $1 billion deficit left by those Liberals. So what we have attempted to do is to clear that situation up. We have done that.

Let me remind the leader of the Opposition, in case she missed it, for the last number of years we have ran a surplus based on prudent and fiscal spending. Last year we spent 36 per cent of a $6.35 billion budget on health care – $2.36 billion. We spent another 20 per cent on education - $1.3 billion.

What we are doing, Mr. Speaker, is looking after the well-being of this Province, continuing to take the steps that we have taken, and we will see our way through this crisis.

Thank you.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

The minister did not answer the question in terms of who has been consulted, who in the business community has been engaged in these discussions by the Province.

Mr. Speaker, let me remind him of something else. The millions of dollars in debt would still be there if it was not for the revenues that rolled in from Hibernia and from Terra Nova and from White Rose and from Voisey’s Bay, projects that were done by Liberal Administrations. Why doesn’t the minister get a history lesson in all the numbers that his department handles, and where that comes from?

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Oh, oh!

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

MS JONES: Mr. Speaker, we do not know of any consultation that has occurred with industry sectors in the Province, so maybe the minister can tell me what dialogue he has had with his federal counterparts in terms of looking at what the proposed economic stimulus package will be from the Government of Canada, how it will impact Newfoundland and Labrador, and what investments will be made here.

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Finance and President of Treasury Board.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. KENNEDY: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.


Well, let me see, a Liberal government when the Upper Churchill was done; let me see, the Lower Churchill was going to be given away by a Liberal government, so don’t talk to me about what the Liberals have done other than leave us in debt, Mr. Speaker.

Now, in terms of what have we done? What have we done? On October 31, I was appointed Minister of Finance. Three days later, I was at a Finance Ministers’ meeting. Since then, Mr. Speaker, I have been at the First Ministers’ meeting with the Premier, I have met with the chief economists of three major banks - the Bank of Montreal, the Toronto-Dominion Bank, and the Royal Bank - I have met with local economists. We are monitoring the situation on a daily basis. We are following the advice that has been given us.

Mr. Speaker, what we have done in this Province is exactly what is suggested in order to battle recession: one, to maintain the course; two, to pay down debt; three, to reduce personal income taxes; and, four, to create employment.

Does that sound like a plan, Leader of the Opposition?

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Maybe the minister can outline for me, then - outside the ministers’ meetings - were there serious discussions with the Government of Canada on investments into sectors of the economy like the fishery, the forestry sectors in Newfoundland and Labrador, Mr. Speaker, and if there will be any investments coming forward for future projects like the Lower Churchill?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Finance and President of Treasury Board.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. KENNEDY: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

In case the Leader of the Opposition has missed it, there appears to be an insurrection going on in Ottawa right now and we are not quite clear who is going to run the government. The Building Canada Fund is not outlined as to how it is going to be dealt with.

The steps we have taken, Mr. Speaker, are to continue to spend – and, again, with some due credit to the Liberals, the Vale Inco deal was announced there a couple of weeks ago; Hebron is on course. So what we are doing, Mr. Speaker, we are taking the steps that need to be taken to maintain a strong economy.

We have also, Mr. Speaker, offered the unions wages, the public sector increases, which will amount to $500 million over four years; 8 per cent which could go into their pockets immediately, Mr. Speaker, and which they could spend for Christmas.

These are the kinds of steps we are taking to stimulate the economy, to battle the recession; and, as has been pointed out, Mr. Speaker, we are actually in the best position in this country to battle this recession and crisis.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Mr. Speaker, it sounds a lot like status quo to me, but let’s establish this. There has been no discussion with the industry leaders in this Province. No discussion with the business community in this Province. No serious discussion with the federal government on forestry and fishery investments or even large scale developments like the Lower Churchill.

Mr. Speaker, let me ask the minister this: Have you had any discussions with the federal government around the perspective sale of shares in Hibernia and has there been any dialogue with our Province, you as the minister, and the feds on that issue?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Finance and President of Treasury Board.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. KENNEDY: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

What we are aware of, Mr. Speaker, as we enter this – as we are in the middle of this crisis actually, is the best way to put it, is that we cannot control everything that goes on in the world.

What is happening in the United States, the sub prime mortgage crisis was not brought on by us. What is going on in Europe and Asia was not brought on by us, but, Mr. Speaker, we have to live in a goldfish bowl if we thought that it does not affect us. So what we have done, we have consulted with the experts, we have looked at our own figures, Mr. Speaker, and we are quite confident that it is by maintaining the status quo, if the status quo, Mr. Speaker, is spending money on infrastructure, building schools and hospitals. If that is the status quo, well yes, we will maintain it because it creates employment, it puts money in the pockets of individuals, and that is what stimulates the economy.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Every other province in the country is getting their heads around what is happening in terms of the economy. The minister claims that we are in the middle of the tsunami on the economy. Economists are saying we might be at the beginning. I do not know where his information is coming from.

Mr. Speaker, let me ask him this: What analysis have been done with regard to the retail sales tax in the Province? We already know that the number of imports coming into the Province has dropped by about 25 per cent. We are hearing of businesses that are closing up shop in Newfoundland and Labrador.

So I would like to ask the minister: What analysis has your department done on what the outlook on retail sales tax will be, and how that will affect the bottom line of the budget this year?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Finance and President of Treasury Board.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. KENNEDY: Mr. Speaker, I am not quite certain what the Leader of the Opposition refers to. Is she talking about retail sales or retail sales tax? Is she talking about revenues? Because last year, Mr. Speaker, the revenues in our Province broke down to - 61.8 per cent came from taxation, which included offshore oil royalties and mining royalties are 37 per cent of our revenues. There was investment; there were fees and fines, other provincial sources, and equalization and the transfers - the Canada social and health transfers.

So I am not quite certain what the hon. Leader of the Opposition is asking me, but if she asking me about retail sales, Mr. Speaker, it is expected that they will grow and they have grown 8.1 per cent, August of this year.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. KENNEDY: Mr. Speaker, we have an actual increase in housing starts. The only province in this country right now, I think, that has an increase in housing starts. We are up to 220, 298 by September.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. KENNEDY: So does she wish me to keep going (inaudible)?

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

My next question is for the Minister of Natural Resources –

MR. KENNEDY: Give up, did you?

MS JONES: Oh, not by far.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MS JONES: I say to the minister, I have hardly given up, I have only just begun.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Oh, oh!

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: It just goes to show, Mr. Speaker, how serious they really take this issue. But I say to him, I am not giving up, Mr. Speaker, by a long shot. There will be lots of questions to come on this.

Mr. Speaker, my question for the Minister of Natural Resources is in relation to an answer she gave us last week when we asked her about the mining operations in Labrador West. She stated she was in regular communications with the mining companies, certainly did not outline that there could be any downscaling of activity there.

So I ask you minister: When were you made aware of the plans of IOC and what the impact was going to be, and why did you not inform the House?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Natural Resources and Deputy Premier.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MS DUNDERDALE: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

At the time that I gave my answer in the House, I had been in discussion with the management of IOC within that twenty-four hour period. I was told at that time that it is was steady as she goes, that they will be slowing down perhaps their Phase I and Phase II development but would still be taking orders. That while the world-wide global crisis was having an impact on them, they saw that if – because they had made significant investments when times were good, they felt strongly that they could weather through the next piece but they were going to further assess that as a company and be in further contact with me, which they were, Mr. Speaker, late last week. That is when I was informed of the significance of the slowdown with regard to Phase I and II, the impact on temporary workers and contractors, but no layoffs are expected at IOC at this time, Mr. Speaker, of permanent employees.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Maybe the minister could inform us as well, when she will get the next update from the company and if you expect that there will be any layoffs going into the summer if the demand for steel remains down?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Natural Resources.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MS DUNDERDALE: Mr. Speaker, we are very proactive in our communication with these companies. I initiated the contact with IOC, especially when Wabush Mines indicated that they might be having some layoffs. I wanted to know where everybody was. That is the plan that they have laid out at the moment, Mr. Speaker. They continue to make investment. One of their pellet plants – each of their six pellet plants will be refurbished during this period. That speaks to their commitment in preparing for a time when production comes up again. They expect a four-week shutdown in July; they are asking everybody to take their holidays at this time. There will be an impact felt on contractors and on temporary employees, but IOC will continue to invest and expects, hopefully, at the end of the year, to have ridden out this crisis.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

At least we have one minister over there who claims to be somewhat proactive. Let me get to the Minister of Health and Community Services, Mr. Speaker.

In the media interview on Friday, the Minister of Health stated that he only recently became aware of a 2003 report on mental health services. Well, Mr. Speaker, this contradicted the information that was contained in all the reports filed by the Child and Youth Advocate from 2003 to 2007, in which the Child Advocate stated that the mental health report was being reviewed by the executive of the Department of Health and Community Services.

So I ask you, Minister: Which is it, did you just become aware of the report in your department and start dealing with it or is the information reported in the Child and Youth Advocate reports incorrect and inaccurate?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. WISEMAN: Mr. Speaker, there is no either-or answer to the question. There are two separate issues. I am not going to refute what the advocate wrote in her report. It is there in black and white. Anyone who wants to read it, they can. So it is there for the reading.

Fundamentally, what I had indicated in the House and indicated outside the House was that, a short while ago, this report of 2003 came to my attention and I have asked officials in the department to start reviewing that report to see about its validity for today, to update any information in it, to look at the suggestions and recommendations that are there, to ensure that they are reasonable, reliable and we can look at them as being a foundation piece to make future decisions. So there is no either-or to the question being posed here, Mr. Speaker.

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Mr. Speaker, there is so much confusion around this particular issue. In 2005 the Child and Youth Advocate indicated that the first option was to review this report, the mental health report, that would be done by the Department of Health and Community Services, and that they would look at therapeutic foster care as a way of reducing the number of youth being sent out of the Province for mental health services.

I ask you, Minister: Was that review ever done in 2005 or was it just told to the Child Advocate, reported in their annual report, and no action taken?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. WISEMAN: Mr. Speaker, personally, I cannot speak to what may have happened in 2005. If the member opposite would like for me to find out whether or not the department reviewed the issue in 2005, I can determine that answer and provide it to the House and to anyone who has an interest, but fundamentally the question to me was with respect to my involvement, what I was personally doing, and what I had indicated just very recently: I had revisited that 2003 report and had it reviewed by officials.

There is no contradiction in the report. The member opposite is trying to make an issue of nothing. Fundamentally, if the advocate has indicated that there were some comments in her report in previous years, that is in black and white, as I said a moment ago, and anyone can read that. I cannot speak to what activity may have taken place within the department in 2005 on this issue but I say, Mr. Speaker, I can speak very clearly to the issues that I have been seized with since I have been minister. With respect to this report, very recently I have directed officials to review that report and provide some advice to me, and I have committed to review the question at hand and to make some decisions on behalf of government, or bring it to my colleagues for decisions on behalf of government.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: Order please!

The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Mr. Speaker, let me ask again. The Child and Youth Advocate reported in 2005, and reported again in 2006, that the Department of Health and Community Services was doing a review of therapeutic foster care as a way of reducing the number of children being sent out of this Province for care. I ask you again, Minister: Was that review ever done in the Department of Health and Community Services? If so, where is it, why was it never tabled, and why were you not aware of it as the minister?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. WISEMAN: If the member opposite can repeat her questions maybe I can repeat my answer.

Fundamentally, I said, Mr. Speaker, anything that is written in the advocate’s report about something she may have said, comments she may have made, it is there in black and white, anyone can read it; I am not going to refute that. Anyone can read that statement.

What I am saying to the member opposite, in response to questions she has made - and I have said to the media, in response to the questions they posed - where the status of that report is today, as of today, in my role as minister, I have recently provided direction to officials in the department to review that report, to sit down with me when they have done that analysis and we will then talk about what actions we will move forward with. I will then decide what recommendations I will bring to my colleagues in Cabinet, and as government we will make a decision around what future direction we will take with respect to enhancing and improving and building upon mental health services for children in this Province, Mr. Speaker.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I want to remind the minister of something: people in this Province need to have confidence in the information that is being reported to them by public offices like that of the Child Advocate or even your office in the Department of Health. Why is this information contained in public documents and you have no knowledge of it?

My question is: Will you find out if the review on therapeutic care was ever completed in this Province and, if not, can you tell me why the Child Advocate was given that information from your department and it reported to the public?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. WISEMAN: If the member opposite wants to stretch out Question Period by repeating the same questions, I can repeat the same answer. I gave you an answer a moment ago. I had indicated to you that I would undertake to find out whether or not a review had taken place and report back to you. I just gave you that answer about two questions ago, but if you want me to repeat it I just did it again. If you would like it repeated again, ask that in your supplementary question again.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Ever since the story broke and these families had the courage to go forward and talk about the mental health issues affecting their children, and the lack of services that they have been getting in the Province, the minister and the department has been hiding behind the fact that they are conducting a review of a report that they have had for five years - five years - and not dealt with. The same department that every report must go to die on a shelf or not be read, Mr. Speaker, I am not sure.

Anyway, let me ask the minister this, while he hides behind that review: Can you give us a firm timetable, when will you be able to respond to the legitimate pleas of these young people in the Province who need help and need services? When can we expect your department to have this current review you talk about completed and have information laid out for the public?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. WISEMAN: Let us make something abundantly clear, Mr. Speaker: This minister, any minister in this government’s Cabinet, does not hide behind any reports.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. WISEMAN: I think, Mr. Speaker, this government has very clearly, since we were elected in 2003, demonstrated that we are an action oriented government. All you need to look at are the investments we have made, the success we have had, and the improvement we have made in the delivery of health services, education, and other social programs in this Province. That is the kind of government we are, Mr. Speaker, not one that hides behind reports.

With respect to the question at hand, though - when will you have it? - I had indicated that they are undertaking a review. Very clearly the problem in this House has been, when the member opposite says, give me a date, then she is on her feet: Why don’t you have it? I clearly indicated to people I have met with respect to this issue, including the families in question, that over the next couple of weeks I will have an opportunity to be able to provide some kind of response.

If the member wants to nail down how we will roll that out and what timeframe, I am not in the position to give her that level of detail.

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Opposition House Leader.

MR. KELVIN PARSONS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

My question is for the Minister of Justice.

On April 18 of this year, then Minister of Justice Kennedy announced a review of the operation of adult corrections in the Province, and this report was received by government in late September of this year.

I ask the minister: Your predecessor had committed to release this report prior to the opening of the House of Assembly, it has not been released, and I am wondering if the minister is in a position to tell us when he intends to reveal the findings of that report.

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Justice and Attorney General.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. T. MARSHALL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I thank the hon. member for his question.

My predecessor, as Minister of Justice, with a goal to improving living and working conditions in the various correctional facilities we have in this Province did ask that an independent review be undertaken in April. Simonne Pourier and Gregory Brown, who are senior managers with the Correction Services of Canada, were retained to do that report and they were joined by Mr. Terry Carlson, a former executive director of the John Howard Society of Newfoundland and Labrador. They have conducted, I think, 275 meetings. They have a report of about 280 pages with seventy-seven recommendations.

After extensive discussion, government is anxious to get this report out. I am very anxious that this report and the whole idea of corrections generally becomes part of the public debate and discourse in this Province. The hon. member does know, however, that there are processes –

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

I ask the hon. minister to conclude his answer.

MR. T. MARSHALL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

There are processes and policies and protocols that we have to go through. We are going through those procedures right now and when they are completed I will be very happy to release the report.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Opposition House Leader.

MR. KELVIN PARSONS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

We had a commitment from this administration in the Blue Book, going back to 2003, about the time they release reports, and I believe sixty-days was the timeline used there. We are certainly well beyond that, I say to the minister.

The review of corrections was considered necessary in response to reports of inhumane treatment at a provincial lockup, a suicide and a preventable death at Her Majesty’s Penitentiary. Media sources indicated at the time that the report itself highlighted some seventy-seven recommendations for improving the state of adult corrections in this Province.

I ask the minister: Assuming that you are reviewing the findings of the report, will the provincial government now undertake any specific inquiries into those alarming deaths and suicides that prompted the report in the first place?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Justice and the Attorney General.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. T. MARSHALL: Mr. Speaker, the first thing of course is for government to complete its work, its protocols in order to look at the report – in order to release the report to members of the general public because I do know that the report will be of great interest to correction officers and to inmates and ex-inmates and their families.

With respect to specific inquiries, I can only tell you that the recommendations are being reviewed. I have met with government officials and with certain members of the general public concerning that request, and that information would come forward in the normal way in due course.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for the District of Signal Hill – Quidi Vidi.

MS MICHAEL: Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, the Minister of Government Services said in Question Period last Thursday that the section of the Occupational Health and Safety regulations covering occupational diseases is being removed because it is too broad and he would have to register all 35,000 workplaces in the Province.

Mr. Speaker, the registry is specifically for the workers who regularly work with biohazardous wastes on dangerous, heavy industrial work sites and with hazardous materials among other things. Not all workers in the Province would have to be registered under these regulations.

Mr. Speaker, I ask the Minister of Government Services: Will he reconsider and revise the draft section of the regulations to indicate that all occupational diseases would be reported?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Government Services.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. O'BRIEN: Mr. Speaker, what I have committed to is to meet with the President of the Federation of Labour and any other of the stakeholders out there, to explain exactly what we are trying to do within the regulations themselves.

Again, to Thursday’s question, my answer is that I see this as a strengthening of the regulations, a strengthening in regards to me as the minister responsible being able to focus in on issues within different industries that we see developing within the Province.

The code of practice that we have developed in regards to silica; the code of practice in Wabush is hailed worldwide, used in other jurisdictions as a template. We have been asked for it from Australia. These are the ways that we can actually address, in a focused way, those issues and those concerns by those workers in these industries.

Again, as well, in regards to the listing of those particular diseases, they are covered off under S.23 of the Workers Compensation Act. So in no way are we violating or changing our focus in regards to industrial disease. It is a concern, but also the safety of the workers are (inaudible).

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

The hon. the Member for the District of Signal Hill-Quidi Vidi.

MS MICHAEL: Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.

I say to the minister that the code of practice is one thing; the identification of the diseases and the workplaces where they are related is another thing, and I think that comes before the code of practice. I have no problem with individual codes of practice. I do have a problem with making sure that all diseases are covered.

So I do have to ask the minister then, in reference to section 23 of the Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation regulations, under the act that covers those regulations: Can the minister actually stand there and tell us that all currently recognizable occupational diseases are covered by section 23, because I have read section 23?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Government Services.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. O'BRIEN: Mr. Speaker, as I said in interviews, and also in regards to the House last week, on last Thursday, I do not believe coming from a profession of pharmacist that we can ever cover off all the diseases that might have to be addressed under occupational disease, because we have a changing global industry. We have industries that are developing in Newfoundland and Labrador as we go forward with our economic development plan, but, in saying that, S.23, as I understand it, will continue to be updated. The list that is currently under the regulations of Occupational Health and Safety and Government Services is forty years old. When I stated, in regards to one of the talk shows, that it was outdated, I meant that some of the diseases might have dropped off the table, but they have not dropped off the tabled. It is just that we have more diseases to deal with, and other industries to deal with that are related to the safety of our workers, which is always a major concern.

HomeIn the House | Question Period