House of Assembly
Newfoundland and Labrador

Oral Questions
December 9, 2009

HomeIn the House | Question Period

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, I understand that a progress report on the Cameron recommendations is not due until March of 2010; however, the previous minister did table on May 28 of this year an update of the status of the recommendations. When you examine the report you see in fact that only one recommendation was fully implemented at that time. I ask the minister today: What progress has been made over the past several months on further implementing the recommendations that were outlined in the Cameron Inquiry?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. KENNEDY: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I can indicate to the member opposite that we are continuing to implement the Cameron recommendations and we are continuing to contribute to the cancer care program in this Province.

Mr. Speaker, in Budget 2008-2009 we provided - I cannot even add it all up here - it is about $60 million for digital mammography units, CT scanners. In 2008 we also indicated another $2.3 million in relation to the collection of information. We are looking at, Mr. Speaker, the PET scanner which we are hoping to have up and running before too long. We are also, Mr. Speaker, the provincial cancer care program is ongoing. We are looking at the issues, Mr. Speaker, especially clinics, the continuation of radiation treatment including $10.6 billion over the past two years to construct bunkers-

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

I ask the hon. member to conclude his response.

MR. KENNEDY: It is just difficult, Mr. Speaker, to outline in a short period of time how much we have been doing, but anyway, I thank the member for her question.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

This inquiry has impacted the lives of many people and I guess the minister would understand why there is extreme interest in monitoring the continued implementation of the recommendations in the report.

I ask him today: Maybe he is prepared to table in the House another progress report on those recommendations during this session?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. KENNEDY: Mr. Speaker, I am aware of the effect, as we all are in this House, the effect that the Cameron Inquiry - the people who were involved in the Cameron inquiry and the effect that had upon them and their families. We are also, Mr. Speaker, aware – and I am glad from a government perspective and from a minister perspective, that an agreement was reached recently between Eastern Health with the members of the class action.

Cancer, Mr. Speaker, is a disease that affects all of us. It is a disease that affects so many people in this Province. We are continuing to invest, Mr. Speaker, in our cancer care funding. We will continue to invest and the Cameron implementations are certainly a very significant part of what we are doing.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

The minister was listing a number of initiatives that they were working on, so maybe he will present in the House of Assembly an update before the session concludes.

Mr. Speaker, the chair of the oncology department at Memorial University, Dr. David Saltman, publicly spoke out on the lack of colorectal cancer screening programs in the Province. He goes as far as to calling the situation a tragedy.

I ask the minister: Why in Newfoundland and Labrador are we falling behind the other provinces when it comes to colorectal cancer screening programs?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. KENNEDY: Yes, thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Obviously, colorectal cancer is a very significant cancer and one that apparently is the second leading cause of cancer in this country.

Mr. Speaker, I am aware of the comments made by Dr. Saltman in the media. I was a bit surprised; Dr. Saltman had written me on October 16 asking for a meeting, but it had nothing to do with the colorectal cancer screening program. However, having said that, this matter has been under discussion for quite some period of time. I indicated over the last couple of days that budget discussions are ongoing; we are certainly looking at a very worthwhile program like colorectal cancer screening. It is a discussion that I would certainly be willing to have with Dr. Saltman at anytime. Discussions are ongoing with Eastern Health, Mr. Speaker, and there is no question that this is a program that we will have to look at, but again in the context of the priorities put forward by Eastern Health and the health care system.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

There are 400 new cases of colorectal cancer diagnosed in this Province each year, and this disease kills approximately 200 of our citizens annually. Early screening for this type of cancer can result in 90 per cent of them being preventable. Our Province also has the highest new cases and mortality in the country, due to this type of cancer.

I ask the minister today, is he prepared to commit to implementing a colorectal cancer screening program, as suggested by the advice of professionals like Dr. Saltman (correct), and also, what would be the timeframes to see this implemented within our Province?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. KENNEDY: Yes, thank you Mr. Speaker. I can indicate that the former minister, now Minister of Business, certainly had this on his radar, and it was a very significant concern for him while he was in the department.

The vice-president, Mr. Speaker, of medical services at Eastern Health advises that a colorectal screening program is a high priority for Eastern Health, and for the Province, considering there is a high incidence, and a genetic predisposition to this type of cancer in this Province. It is my understanding, Mr. Speaker, that we will now go through the budget process and we will look at it – Eastern Health has indicated that it is a high priority. Then, what will happen, Mr. Speaker, after the budget process, it is my understanding that a colorectal screening coordinator would have to be hired and would take at least six months to get a provincial program in place, once the coordinator is hired. So as we go through the budget process, Mr. Speaker, we will look at this, and I can indicate to the hon. member opposite, and to Dr. Saltman, to other residents in this Province, Mr. Speaker, that this is a matter that we will look closely at in this budget and see where it goes. Thank you.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank the minister for his response, Mr. Speaker.

The future of AbitibiBowater – their current and former workers and pensioners, are now buried in extensive legal challenges. The latest court action of your government has been an attempt to force the company to reveal corporate financial information using the argument that the Province is in effect, a creditor of the company. What is the status of this legal action, and when can we expect to see a ruling?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Innovation, Trade and Rural Development.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SKINNER: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, as the people of the Province know, this government did step up for the former AbitibiBowater employees, there have been some 800, 900 employees – former employees of AbitibiBowater that we have stepped in and provided assistance to. We deemed that the benefits that they were to receive were the responsibility of AbitibiBowater. AbitibiBowater did not live up to that responsibility, and this government stepped forward to ensure that the people of the Central region, who are entitled to benefits, received those benefits as they should have gotten them. Thank you.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Maybe the minister could update us on what the status is of the legal action that government was taking and when we can expect to see some conclusion of it, or, at least some ruling around it.

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Justice and the Attorney General.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. F. COLLINS: Mr. Speaker, with regard to the action CCA claims of monies owing to the Province the position of the government is that we are not pursuing these claims because there are insufficient funds. We figure there are insufficient funds with Abitibi to compensate for those claims. The costs of legal, the cost would be (inaudible)

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

So, I understood that court action was going to be taken by the government simply because it was felt that they were a creditor of the company. Do I understand clearly now that the minister is telling me that there will be no legal action taken to recover the monies that were paid out?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Justice and the Attorney General.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. F. COLLINS: Mr. Speaker, it is the belief of the Province at this time that the insufficient funds, given the insolvency,, or the CCA claims, or CCA activities of Abitibi, there is insufficient funds there to recover under the claims that we are looking for.

At this stage of the game, that is the position of government.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Mr. Speaker, reports indicate that the AbitibiBowaters pensioners, which are under funded by some $1.3 billion, are putting pensioners’ income at risk in our Province as well. As a solution, the union, the company, with the support of Ontario and Quebec governments are proposing that governments back a proposal to establish a pension trust. This should protect the income of company pensioners should the company finally fall into bankruptcy. Without governments taking action many of these pensioners will take a hit of at least 25 to 33 per cent or more in their income. It will affect workers in both the Grand Falls mill as well as the former Stephenville mill.

My question to the minister is: Has your government been involved in this proposal to establish a pension trust and to aid in the protecting of pension funds for workers in our Province?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Finance and President of Treasury Board.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. T. MARSHALL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

The whole issue of pensions is certainly on the radar of the country and pension plans that are in trouble, such as the Abitibi-Bowater pension plan, which the hon. the Leader of the Opposition has just mentioned. It is very fortunate that the pension plan for our employees in this Province, our employees do not have that same problem, our retirees do not have that same problem because of investments that this government has made to the tune of $3 billion in the pension plan, and the fact that the taxpayers behind the pension plan provide security for our own retired employees. With respect to pension plans like AbitibiBowater we hear in the news of the pension plans like Nortel up in Ontario, these plans are under great pressure because the companies themselves are in financial difficulty and will be unable to make their contributions but I am pleased to advise the hon. member that there will be a federal, provincial, territorial meeting of finance ministers this coming Wednesday in Whitehorse and I will be attending and I will be happy, when I get back, to report to this House as to the results of the reports that have been provided for finance ministers to deal with this very important issue.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I guess we are all aware of what has been going on nationally especially with Nortel over the last number of years, but, in spite of all of that, Mr. Speaker, we do know that there has been discussions between the union, companies, the Government of Quebec, the Government of Ontario and the federal government around the pension trust piece and looking at it as an option for Abitibi pensioners that will be effected. So again, I ask the minister outside of the territorial meetings that you will participate in is your government prepared to get involved in the process that is ongoing to help protect the pension incomes of former Abitibi workers in our Province?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Finance and President of Treasury Board.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. T. MARSHALL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

In addition to the FPT meetings at which time reports that have been contracted for to deal with this important will be presented to the finance ministers and the federal government and the provincial governments and territories in Whitehorse next week. In addition to that I know the Premiers have also commissioned research reports into this issue and those reports will also be presented at the end of the year and with those reports that will inform government right across the country as to the appropriate steps that we can take to help pensioners given the pressure that pension plans are under.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

In the severance payments that were provided to Abitibi workers by the government last year, there were conditions and timelines that were attached, however, since that deadline there are dozens of workers that have been laid off. These individuals have yet to receive any severance payments although they have applied for government sponsored severance. Some of them their applications date back to September of this year and I ask the government today are you prepared to provide and pay out the severance to those workers that were outside the timelines and if you are why is it taking so long to have their payments processed and issued to them?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Innovation, Trade and Rural Development.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SKINNER: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, as I have indicated in this House before, this government did step up for the former workers of AbitibiBowater. This government did provide some $25-$26 million in severance and other benefits to workers who were displaced from AbitibiBowater in the Central region. The reason that we are still processing some of these claims, Mr. Speaker, is that as we move forward new information is becoming uncovered each day with some of these; it has been difficult to get information. We have also found out that people are being laid off after the original; I will call it, mass layoff that was done back in April of this year.

As we encounter those situations we are processing those claims and we will continue to do that. We will continue to support the people of the Central region; we will continue to provide the benefits that they should have received. This government stepped up and did it before; we will continue to do that, Mr. Speaker.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Reports indicate that Newfoundland and Labrador Refining Corporation has emerged from bankruptcy. The judge in the case has given them two years to find a buyer or a partner in their proposed $4 billion project.

I ask the minister: Have you met with the proponents of this project before or since they emerged from the bankruptcy position?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Deputy Premier and Minister of Natural Resources.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MS DUNDERDALE: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, the department watches very carefully what is happening in the energy sector in this Province. We are aware all the time what is happening; there are informal discussions that are ongoing on a regular basis. I have not had a formal meeting with the principles of the Newfoundland and Labrador Refining Corporation since this action has taken place.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I would like to ask the minister: Has the government or near government agencies like Nalcor or their subsidiaries; have they given consideration to taking any equity stake in the refinery or to contribute public money to this particular development?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Deputy Premier.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MS DUNDERDALE: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

No, we have not.

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

One final question for the minister on this issue because we know that government has acted on behalf of this refinery proponent in the past, in terms of looking at recruiting partners or buyers. I think the last incident we heard publicly was from Qatar and a trip they took to the Middle East.

I ask the minister today: Has there been any indication that those meetings will result in new investments for this refinery project and this company, or is there still follow up taking place to those meetings?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Deputy Premier.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MS DUNDERDALE: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, as we do our work here in the Province, across the country, and around the world, we promote Newfoundland and Labrador and companies who operate here as good places for people to invest money. That is part of the responsibility we have as a government. So we, wherever we go, at every opportunity we have, we promote Newfoundland and Labrador as a good place to invest.

Once we make people aware of that, unless we are asked to intervene or become involved, Mr. Speaker, we allow then, the companies and the investors to further build those relationships and make whatever arrangements work in the best interests of both parties, Mr. Speaker.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Opposition House Leader.

MR. KELVIN PARSONS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

On Monday, I directed some questions concerning the ongoing issue involving the Child and Youth Advocate to the Minister of Finance. Minister, we are now aware that Mr. Bern Coffey, the solicitor for Ms Neville, has filed an appeal of last Friday’s Supreme Court decision regarding her right to appear before this house. Given that a definitive resolution regarding Ms Neville was postponed during the September sitting of this House because these matters were before the courts, is government now prepared to postpone the introduction of a definitive resolution, pending disposition of Ms Neville’s appeal?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Finance and President of Treasury Board.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. T. MARSHALL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

With respect to the matter surrounding the Child and Youth Advocate, the government has received the complaint of the Speaker of the House, the government has also received a response and has heard from Ms Neville. We received a ninety-two page document outlining her response to the allegations made. Government is considering the information that it has before it, and in due course, government will bring forth a resolution to be determined in this House, and it will be the appropriate resolution at the appropriate time.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Opposition House Leader.

MR. KELVIN PARSONS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I just had some correspondence delivered, in fact, as we entered the House today, again from Mr. Coffey, solicitor for Ms Neville, who indicates that she has had absolutely no opportunity, since she was advised of her suspension, about an opportunity to provide any information to cabinet, or to speak to cabinet. I asked the minister this question on Friday – or excuse me, on Monday past – would Ms Neville be afforded an opportunity to appear before the House, or before cabinet, and the minister at that time said bluntly, no. I am wondering if the minister could take an opportunity to explain why you are not allowing her an opportunity.

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Finance and President of Treasury Board.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. T. MARSHALL: Mr. Speaker, the principles of natural justice will allow Ms Neville to state her case to the government, and that has happened. As I said, we received a ninety-two page outline of the case that she has made.

In the case of Fraser March, he was not given that opportunity. Mr. March was dismissed by the Internal Economy Commission of the House without being given an opportunity to make his case. In Ms Neville’s situation, the case has been heard by government, government is reviewing it, and it is reviewing the allegations from the Speaker. Government will make its determination and bring a resolution before the House so the House can make the final determination of this matter and end it once and for all.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Opposition House Leader.

MR. KELVIN PARSONS: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Just for the information of the minister, Mr. March was not terminated by the Internal Economy Commission. Mr. March was terminated from his employment by a resolution of this House of Assembly. Now, the government has gone back, as we know, and allowed Mr. March and opportunity to have natural justice by way of Justice O’Neill, whose report is due on Friday.

I ask the minister: If you were prepared to see that natural justice was allowed in the case of Mr. March, who was dismissed by this House, why would not be prepared to allow Ms Neville the same opportunity?

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

The hon. the Minister of Finance and President of Treasury Board.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. T. MARSHALL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, I have already answered that question. The principles of natural justice allow Ms Neville to make a response. The response, a ninety-two page response has been received and is being considered by government.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for The Straits & White Bay North.

MR. DEAN: Mr. Speaker, a common practice by small boat fisher people in our Province for years, if not decades, has been the practice of selling cod fish locally, either at the wharf or door-to-door, on the back of their truck and so on. This past season commercial fishers in this Province have received warnings from the DFA fishery inspectors that it is illegal to sell cod fish locally. My question for the Minister of Fisheries is: Why has your department suddenly decided to bring stronger enforcement to that regulation?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Fisheries and Aquaculture.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. JACKMAN: Mr. Speaker, under the Fish Inspection Act fish harvesters are only permitted to sell to licensed fish processors and buyers. Everyone knows in the Province that oftentimes that is something that is not followed. I think some people would go out and purchase a bit of fish off a fisherman and not even know that they are in contravention of the law.

Mr. Speaker, at the union convention just a little over a week ago, I was approached by some fishermen on that particular issue. I told them at that particular point that I would discuss it with my officials and see where we might be able to go with that, and that, in fact, Mr. Speaker, is what I am doing and will continue to do. We will see how gets resolved.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for the District of Port de Grave.

MR. BUTLER: Mr. Speaker, I assure you my questions today have nothing to do with electricity.

On Monday, Mr. Speaker, I asked the Minister of Finance with regards to the $300 rebate for oil tank replacements and he told me that he would undertake to find the answers to that question so I ask the minister today how many people are waiting for their rebates and when will the checks be forthcoming?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Finance and President of Treasury Board.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. T. MARSHALL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, the year before last I think there was a budget allocation of $750,000 in the budget but the take up was only around $71,000 so the following year the amount allocated was $75,000 and of course the take up was in excess of that amount. Funds were transferred into the program on August 13, on September 22 and again on November 30 and I am advised by the Comptroller General that 284 checks were sent out yesterday afternoon to these people.

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for the District of Port de Grave.

MR. BUTLER: Mr. Speaker, I thank the minister for that response.

It is December 9 and again our office is flooded with e-mails and telephone calls asking questions: Where is the home heating fuel rebate? Last year it was announced on December 8. The year before it was December 6. It seems like each year the announcements are coming later and later. I ask the minister: When can we expect the announcement with regards to the home heating fuel rebates this year?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Finance and President of Treasury Board.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. T. MARSHALL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Government announced in March of this year that the home heating rebate program would be a permanent program and we also announced that the program, along with the parental benefits program will be moved to Grand Falls and will provide twenty-five jobs in that Central Newfoundland community to attempt to mitigate in a small way the job losses from the closure of the mill. So the program is now permanent. The parameters of the program are being discussed. They were discussed between me and some of my colleagues today and I expect to be in a position in the not-too-distant future to announce the parameters which are the amount of the rebate and the income eligibility threshold. There are three permanent positions hired in Grand Falls-Windsor now. There are twenty-two permanent seasonal workers who, these positions should be filled by mid-December. The interviews took place the week of November 23 and we are looking forward to the program. These will be new workers-

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Oh, oh!

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

MR. T. MARSHALL: - but-

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

I ask the hon. minister to conclude his response.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for the District of Signal Hill-Quidi Vidi.

MS MICHAEL: Thank you, very much, Mr. Speaker.

I too want to ask the Minister of Finance about the Home Heating Rebate and I am glad to know that the steps have been taken to make it a permanent program as had been promised in the March Budget, but, Mr. Speaker, the people who rely on this rebate do not have a lot of money and the waiting game is very difficult for them as they try to budget, especially as they come into the winter and the Christmas season. The minister has said a number of times that the rebate is only a small amount of money but for these people it is not a small amount and I am hoping this year it is going to be more.

I am asking the minister: If he can tell us why there is always this waiting game and why it is so difficult to come up with, as he called it, the perimeters of the program?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Finance and the President of Treasury Board.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. T. MARSHALL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

The program is announced – the perimeters of the program are usually announced in December, around this time every year. We are going through that process and analysis was done; we analyzed the changes in the fuel cost and changes in electricity cost. We had a good look at it and when I have completed my discussions with my colleagues the perimeters will be announced for this year as well.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for the District of Signal Hill-Quidi Vidi.

MS MICHAEL: Mr. Speaker, I would like to point out to the minister that the phone calls to our office, and I assume it is probably the same for other MHAs; those phone calls begin early in November.

I am wondering: Can the minister tell me whether or not he is willing to take under advisement trying to get this out earlier in the future?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Finance and President of Treasury Board.

MR. T. MARSHALL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

As I said earlier, the program is now a permanent program; it will not be an ad hoc program anymore. There are three full-time employees – three permanent employees in Grand Falls, twenty-two permanent seasonal employees. As soon as they get trained they will get the program out, and then each year after that the program should come out earlier.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for the District of Signal Hill-Quidi Vidi.

MS MICHAEL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I hope the training begins immediately so that people will not have to wait next year.

Mr. Speaker, in fall update 2009, the GDP is used as an indicator of how the Province is doing. Unfortunately, Mr. Speaker, the GDP does not give an accurate and authentic picture of what is really happening to people here in the Province and what is happening in their lives.

Mr. Speaker, the financial updates used by our Province and others - not just by ours, whether purposefully or not, I do not know - do not reference recognized social indicators such as hunger, homelessness, illiteracy or unemployment and therefore do not give a true economic picture of the lives of the people in the Province.

Mr. Speaker, I ask the Premier: When is this government going to give an accurate view of how all people are actually faring in our new economy?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Finance and President of Treasury Board.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. T. MARSHALL: Fortunately, the people of this Province, especially people at the low end, are doing much better because this government has done more for people in poverty than any other government in the history of Newfoundland and Labrador.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. T. MARSHALL: Mr. Speaker, I refer to the Seniors’ Benefit, which was enhanced last year. We are giving seniors $800 every October. I refer to the fact that we allow seniors to split their pension income. We have expanded the Home Heating Rebate program. When we came into office, there were 11,000 people getting the program – there are 76,000 got the program last year.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. T. MARSHALL: Mr. Speaker, we removed thousands of low-income people from the tax rolls. Mr. Speaker, we gave the people of this Province the biggest tax cut in the history of Newfoundland and Labrador. We lowered 174 fees, we lowered motor vehicle registration, and we increased the provincial home repair program.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

MR. T. MARSHALL: We provided money for drug programs, we increased the RAP program, and we are going to continue to help people (inaudible).

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

The time allotted for questions and answers has expired.

HomeIn the House | Question Period