MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Leader of the
Opposition.
MS JONES:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, in a few weeks we
will be starting a new year and once again public
service pensioners will see no improvement to their
pensions.
I ask the minister today:
With the rising cost of living,
will your budget recognize the struggles of these former
public servants in the next year?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of Finance and
President of Treasury Board.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. T. MARSHALL:
Mr. Speaker, pensions is certainly a
big issue in the public discourse of our nation today.
Finance ministers and ministers responsible for pensions
are meeting in Whitehorse today, as we speak, concerning
issues that are affecting pensioners right across the
country.
I know the Minister of Government
Services is in Whitehorse today taking part in those
discussions, and he is doing that in his capacity as a
minister responsible for the Pension Benefits Act, which
is the legislation which administers all pensions in
this Province.
Mr. Speaker, this government has
concerns for all public pensioners but we have to help
everyone, not just those who have a public pension, but
also people who do not have pensions and others who may
have worked in the private sector who also do not have
indexed pensions. So all our efforts will be broad based
and will help our pre-retirees and our seniors who need
help and we will provide that help.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Leader of the
Opposition.
MS JONES:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
This is a government that
certainly expects the federal government to help bail
out pensioners at a time when they need it, but
obviously they are not stepping up to the plate to look
after our own public service pensioners. They submitted
a proposal to your government and offered suggestions on
how to help many of those who are on public service
pensions but living below the poverty line.
I ask the minister:
Have you even considered this
proposal that could help thousands of these low-income
pensioners who live in our own Province?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of Finance and
President of Treasury Board.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. T. MARSHALL:
Mr. Speaker, the pensioners are
former employees of the provincial government. They are
getting the pension that was promised to them. In these
tough and uncertain economic times, because of major
investments of in excess of $3 billion invested in these
pension plans, our pensioners are in fact receiving what
they paid for and what was promised to them. Unlike
pensioners in other pension plans who are running the
risk that their pensions will be reduced by up to 30 per
cent.
Our government will continue to
make broad based initiatives that will help all
low-income citizens of Newfoundland and Labrador, but we
have to help everybody and we have to help especially
those who need it.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Leader of the
Opposition.
MS JONES:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
The proposal that they have
presented to the minister would help those who most
needed it in the Province. There was a cut-off point,
obviously, established to ensure that those who were at
the higher public service pension limits would not
receive the same increases.
I ask the minister:
Has that offer been given
consideration, and is government looking at implementing
something to that standard for these pensioners?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of Finance and
President of Treasury Board.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. T. MARSHALL:
Mr. Speaker, I have met, in my
capacity as Minister of Finance, on a previous occasion
with the pensioners association and I will meet with
them again. As a matter of fact, we set up a situation
where they would meet with officials in the Department
of Finance from time to time to exchange information. I
have considered all the requests, and anything we do
will be dealt with in the budget and it will be done in
accordance with good fiscal policy and that is fair to
all citizens in the Province.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Leader of the
Opposition.
MS JONES:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
These public sector pensioners are
also seeing clawbacks to their pensions once they reach
the age of sixty-five as a result of the Canada Pension
entitlements.
I ask the minister:
If he thinks that this is fair,
and if he has had any discussions with his
federal-provincial counterparts on this issue so that it
can be addressed and these individuals can have a little
more money in their pockets?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of Finance and
President of Treasury Board.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. T. MARSHALL:
Mr. Speaker, it is not a claw back.
When the pension plan was designed, it was designed to
be reduced at the age of sixty-five when the Canada
Pension Plan would kick in at that date.
Government has, of course, looked
at the requests from the pensioners dealing with claw
back and as to the cost that that would have on the
Treasury of the Province. Government will continue to
consider all reasonable proposals from people as we
consider going forward in the budget process. It is very
important to ensure that all people are protected, not
just those who were fortunate enough to have a public
sector pension fund backed by the taxpayers of the
Province.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Leader of the
Opposition.
MS JONES:
Mr. Speaker, the minister keeps
talking about how he has considered their proposal and
considered their options.
I ask you, minister:
Are you prepared to act, and what
is it you are going to do for these people, something or
nothing?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of Finance and
President of Treasury Board.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. T. MARSHALL:
Mr. Speaker, this government removed
thousands of those people from the tax rolls in this
Province. This government gave the people of this
Province the biggest and largest tax cut in the history
of Newfoundland and Labrador. This government has
provided a Home Heating Rebate to people who heat their
homes with fuel and electricity. This government has
given a benefit every October to low-income seniors. We
will help people who need help. We have to treat
everybody fairly.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Leader of the
Opposition.
MS JONES:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Tax cuts never help those who live
below the poverty line, and the minister knows that –
and neither does increasing electricity rates in the
Province.
I ask the minister today, here we
are, right now, the Public Utilities Board has just
announced an increase to customers effective January 1.
That was as a result of an application by Newfoundland
and Labrador Power, where those consumers will see their
power bills increase by 3.5 per cent.
I ask the minister:
What impact will this increase
have on the customers of Newfoundland and Labrador
Hydro?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Deputy Premier.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MS DUNDERDALE:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, as you know,
electricity is regulated here in this Province by the
PUB, and in terms of Newfoundland Hydro particularly,
Mr. Speaker, they are restricted to a very small return
on the service that they provide to the people of
Newfoundland and Labrador.
Mr. Speaker, as costs go up, as
capital, construction, renovation, repair, new
transmission lines are required, there is a requirement
for new investments. What we do as a government, Mr.
Speaker, as the Minister of Finance has just spoken so
eloquently to, is ensure that the people who are
impacted in the most serious way have some mitigation
provided to them through programs like our Home Heating
Program.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Leader of the
Opposition.
MS JONES:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
The minister talks about the rates
being set by the Public Utilities Board, but it was back
in June that she made a submission or representation to
them asking them to earn a return and equity equal to
that of Newfoundland Power for Newfoundland and Labrador
Hydro.
I ask the minister today:
Now that you have directed the
Public Utilities Board to do just that, why don’t you
tell us what that direction will cost to people who are
customers of Newfoundland Power come January?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Deputy Premier and
Minister of Natural Resources.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MS DUNDERDALE:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, the one thing that
the people of this Province expect, and have a right to
expect, is a quality of service from both the utilities
in this Province who provide energy to the whole
Province.
Mr. Speaker, Newfoundland Hydro,
like Newfoundland Power, needs to have the capacity to
do the kind of refurbishment to make the kind of
investments that are required to ensure that we have a
top-notch energy company in the Crown corporation giving
the same kind of service, the same quality of service as
Newfoundland Power does.
What we have in the PUB is to
ensure that the rates that are being charged, Mr.
Speaker, are fair and all of us, certainly on this side
of the House, have confidence in the PUB and the service
that they are providing to the people of the Province.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Leader of the
Opposition.
MS JONES:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I ask the minister:
Does she think that capacity at
Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro should come at further
expense to the customers who rely upon this electricity
service, while your government is out investing money in
equity shares in oil companies?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. Deputy Premier and Minister
of Natural Resources.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MS DUNDERDALE:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, we have to provide a
service here in this Province. We have to provide energy
to the people of the Province for domestic use. We have
to provide energy for industrial use and to drive
business here in the Province. Under the PUB, we have
set up a mechanism to ensure that is done fairly.
Mr. Speaker, from time to time
government does intervene. We intervene by providing
substantial subsidies to our isolated communities, our
isolated diesel communities here in the Province,
particularly under the Northern Strategic Plan in
Labrador. We work very hard at buffering high prices of
energy for people who have difficulty in paying. We use
our energy resources that we have, Mr. Speaker, to drive
industrial development here in the Province to provide
work for Newfoundlanders and Labradorians so they can
pay their bills.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
The hon. the Leader of the
Opposition.
MS JONES:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
We know that Newfoundland Light
and Power’s customers will see a 3.5 per cent increase
in their electricity rates come January 1, so I ask the
minister today: Based on the
fact that you have directed the Public Utilities Board
that they must have a return on equity, what will that
rate increase be for the customers of Newfoundland and
Labrador Hydro?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of Natural
Resources and Deputy Premier.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MS DUNDERDALE:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, the whole process of
the setting of rates here in Newfoundland and Labrador
is under the purview of the Public Utilities Board. When
appropriate, Newfoundland Hydro will make application
for a rate increase, if they deem one is necessary. They
will have to vigorously defend that position at the PUB,
and the people of Newfoundland and Labrador through the
consumer advocate –
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
MS DUNDERDALE:
– or through other mechanisms that
are available to them, Mr. Speaker, have the right to
intervene and to state their case whether or not they
think what Newfoundland Hydro is asking for is fair or
appropriate.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
The hon. the Leader of the
Opposition.
MS JONES:
The minister is the one who asked
them to get return on equity, and she still does not
know how that is going affect people of the Province and
how much more they are going to have to pay – I think
that is ridiculous, Mr. Speaker.
Government reached a tentative
agreement with private ambulance operators back in
November. While this was a good first step – I think
everyone recognizes that – I have had a number of calls
and e-mails from small ambulance operators in the
Province, and their workers, who have outstanding
concerns. They have been unable to get a meeting with
the minister.
I ask you today, Minister:
Are you prepared to meet with
these small ambulance operators, and listen to their
concerns and try and deal with the issues that they have
to face in the coming year?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of Finance and
President of Treasury Board.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. T. MARSHALL:
Mr. Speaker, the Government of
Newfoundland and Labrador entered into a successful
tentative agreement with the private ambulance
operators, and more funds were put in to enhance the
contract they had, and that enabled to pay their
employees a much better salary than they were previously
paying.
Mr. Speaker, we are pleased to
meet the agreement. I understand that the Department of
Health has prepared the contracts; the contracts have
all been sent out. It is my understanding that twenty of
twenty-eight have been returned. As soon as they get on
the desk of the Minister of Health, they will be signed
and sent back to the private operators.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Leader of the
Opposition.
MS JONES:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I think the minister realizes that
there is a problem here, and the problem is in the
classification of these ambulance operators. The smaller
operators are unable to pay their employees based on the
contract amounts that were granted to them. They were
under the impression that they could give wage increases
to their staff, which now they cannot, and
they want an opportunity to
discuss this with you, Minister, and with your
department to see if they can sort this out. I ask you
if you are prepared to do that.
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of Finance and
President of Treasury Board.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. T. MARSHALL:
Mr. Speaker, the Government of
Newfoundland and Labrador negotiated with the ambulance
operators through their association. A tentative deal
was reached then the contracts were prepared and sent
out to the operators.
If some of the members of the
association are having difficulty with the agreement
that their executive and their association met with
government, then that is an internal matter involving
the private ambulance association.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Leader of the
Opposition.
MS JONES:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
The issue here is that a number of
these smaller operators feel that they are not being
granted the provisions that were originally negotiated
in the contract. As a result of it, they are falling
short in being able to offer up the kind of increases
they should to their employees.
I ask you again, Minister:
Are you prepared to meet with them
and discuss this issue?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of Finance and
President of Treasury Board.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. T. MARSHALL:
Mr. Speaker, government met with the
private ambulance operators and negotiated a contract -
a contract which they agreed to and government agreed
to. The money has been made available to meet the
agreement -
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
MR. T. MARSHALL:
Government’s obligation is to pay the
agreement -
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
MR. T. MARSHALL:
Now, what is happening is that the
hon. the Leader of the Opposition is now attempting to
renegotiate the contract here on the floor of the House
of Assembly.
MS JONES:
(Inaudible) are you going to
meet with them?
MR. T. MARSHALL:
Mr. Speaker, I am sure the Minister
of Health and I, as Minister of Finance, would be very
happy to meet with any citizen of this Province.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for the District
of The Straits & White Bay North.
MR. DEAN:
Mr. Speaker, government has committed
to developing a new physical arrangement with
municipalities to ensure they can provide services to
their residents and maintain infrastructure. This new
physical arrangement was supposed to be put in place by
March of this year.
I ask the minister today:
Could you please provide an update
as to when this arrangement with municipalities will be
in place?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Acting Minister of
Municipal Affairs.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. HEDDERSON:
Mr. Speaker, we are always attempting
to ensure that we are moving forward in our relationship
with municipalities. I am not exactly sure what the
member is asking about the particular fiscal
arrangement. All I can say is that we do grant to our
municipalities on capital works and so on with a ratio
of 90-10, 80-20, and 70-30.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. HEDDERSON:
As well, we lobbied hard for the
federal government and allow them now to use their gas
tax for water quality and waste management. So I am not
sure where the member is coming from.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for the District
of The Straits & White Bay North.
MR. DEAN:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
The department has stated a goal
that they were developing a physical framework by March,
2009. That is what the question was. Nevertheless, Mr.
Speaker, many communities are finding it more difficult
to provide services to their residents, and municipal
operating grants often help subsidize services such as
snow clearing, garbage collection, street lighting and
so on.
Again, I ask the minister today:
Has your department reviewed
the Municipal Operating Grant program, and are there any
plans to increase the monies provided to towns
throughout the Province?
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
The hon. the Minister of Municipal
Affairs.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. HEDDERSON:
Mr. Speaker, again, we have a working
relationship, a very strong relationship to
Municipalities Newfoundland and Labrador, and we work
very closely with that organization to try to continue
to build on the assistance that we give to our
municipalities. We understand the challenges that they
are under, but again, I would say to the hon. member,
we, as a government, understand those challenges. We are
working with the municipalities and we are achieving
tremendous results.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for the District
of Port de Grave.
MR. BUTLER:
Mr. Speaker, we know the people of
Buchans have been through a lot over the past few months
and there are more concerns there today with the
potential of contaminate dust from the tailings pond. A
consultant determined that the dam which maintains the
integrity of the tailings pond is in serious disrepair
and the water level should be reduced by two metres to
take care of the pressure. This past weekend residents
of Buchans were reeling as the reduction of water levels
exposed them to more contaminate dust.
I ask the minister:
What actions are you taking to
mitigate against people being exposed to those potential
harmful chemicals?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of Environment
and Conservation.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MS JOHNSON:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, we have an excellent
working relationship with the Town of Buchans, in
particular the mayor there. We have consulted him every
step of the way on this. The issue of the dam is a
safety issue. Through the Department of Natural
Resources they hired a consultant. We acted immediately
on the recommendations. The final report is expected to
come in within the next week or so, but we have already
acted to lower the water levels, close off the gate in
terms of safety, and add some of the coarse sand and
gravel that is required there for the structural
integrity, Mr. Speaker.
We went above and beyond that
because the mayor did raise the issue of dust. We went
above and beyond and applied a dust suppressant. That
has already been taken care of and my understanding is
the mayor is absolutely more than pleased, and I suggest
you talk to him yourself.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for the District
of Port de Grave.
MR. BUTLER:
Mr. Speaker, in other jurisdictions
where a mining company leaves or goes bankrupt the local
government often finds itself with responsibilities for
the maintenance and monitoring of tailing dumps.
According to the same municipal leaders that the
minister just mentioned, we know that the tailings pond
dam will eventually need to be replaced.
I ask the minister:
Will government commit to
replacing the dam, and if so, when will this happen?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of Natural
Resources and Deputy Premier.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MS DUNDERDALE:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, over the years mining
companies have come to this Province, they have
exploited our resources, they have left with money in
their pocket and left a big mess behind. Currently, we
are dealing with Buchans. This government has been
dealing with Baie Verte. We have spent over $10 million
there in the last three years trying to begin the
remediation work that is required.
Mr. Speaker, we will do everything
we can to clean up, and we will over time clean up all
of the messes that these companies have left behind
them. Right now, Mr. Speaker, we have legislation in
place that anybody who is going to operate a mine in
this Province has to have fiscal tools and guarantees in
place for remediation when the mine closes so we never,
ever, get left in this position again.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for the District
of Port de Grave.
MR. BUTLER:
Mr. Speaker, we have learned today
that the lone constable for the RCMP in Buchans, and I
understand that his wife and children have already left
the community, and he will be transferred out as well
due to the level of lead contaminants. We know that
there are serious concerns in the community that will
not be solved overnight.
However, I ask the minister:
What police services will be made
available to the people of that community after April,
and since it is a concern to the RCMP, what assurance
can they give the residents that this town is safe?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of Justice and
Attorney General.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. F. COLLINS:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Yes, we are aware of the fact that
the lone RCMP officer in Buchans has moved his family
out. The officer himself is still stationed in Buchans
and intends to stay in Buchans until such time as he is
transferred, and our understanding is that the staff in
Buchans will remain. The detachment will continue to be
staffed. There is no issue there, Mr. Speaker, with the
member being moved out because of contaminants. He has
moved his family, but the staffing remains the same.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for the District
of Port de Grave.
MR. BUTLER:
Mr. Speaker, in October, I requested
under the Access to Information Act a breakdown of the
$500,000 allocated for design and planning work for the
proposed long-term care facility in Carbonear. I still
have not received a response from the Department of
Health on that request.
I ask the minister:
Can you provide an update to the
people of the Conception Bay North area on the status of
the long-term care facility, and whether the design and
planning work has been completed?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of Health and
Community Services.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. KENNEDY:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I am very pleased to announce that
the planning and design is proceeding. In fact, it was
not too long ago - if the hon. member had watched Ed
Swain on NTV News he would have seen Ed there at the
facility in Carbonear showing where we were going to put
the long-term care. The consultants were there with us
that day, the mayor of the town was there, and everyone
was very happy. It is going to be a state-of-the-art
facility, Mr. Speaker, and it is going to be one that
the people of Carbonear-Harbour Grace area will be very
proud of.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for the District
of Port de Grave.
MR. BUTLER:
Mr. Speaker, I thank the minister for
his response, but I hope there is more to it than just a
photo op.
Mr. Speaker, I asked the Minister
of Transportation and Works in the Estimates this past
year if the department will be once again looking at
maintaining Class 4 roads to a certain degree. The
minister’s response at the time was that a review was
being done and that they would take a look at this in
the near future.
So I ask the minister:
Has the review been completed, and
if so, what are the results of that review?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Transportation and Works.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. HEDDERSON:
Mr. Speaker, the review is underway
and when it is completed, obviously, I could release the
considerations if indeed a review has been undertaken. I
will have to go back and review to see where we are on
that particular one. I will review the review.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for the District
of Port de Grave.
MR. BUTLER:
Mr. Speaker, I have to say that is
almost like opening and closing the roads at the same
time.
Mr. Speaker, with all due respect
to the minister, I was hoping that he would be able to
stand in his place today, because I know a review was
done, that was from both former ministers, the hon.
Minister Whelan and hon. Minister Taylor. Enough time
has gone by that there should have been something.
I am just wondering:
Can the minister confirm today
that definitely they will be doing work on Class 4
roads?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of
Transportation and Works.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. HEDDERSON:
I say to the hon. member opposite
again, that we will review the review and get back to
you.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for the District
of Signal Hill-Quidi Vidi.
MS MICHAEL:
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.
I have some questions that I would
like to put to the Minister of Health and Community
Services with regard to the private and community
ambulance operators. As has been pointed out, their
retroactive cheques, which have been agreed to, are
ready and they are with the regional health authorities.
They are printed and they are being held until the
government officially signs off.
I would like to know from the
minister: What is the hold up on releasing the
retroactive cheques, especially for those who have
signed the contracts? If they have signed, why can’t
they be signed off for them?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of Health and
Community Services.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. KENNEDY:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
It is my understanding that this
deal that was reached, was reached with the Ambulance
Operators Association that includes twenty-eight or more
contracts. We have, a number of contracts are either in
my office or on their way.
I have received ten today from the
Western Health Authority which I was ready to sign.
However, having regard to the fact that the Liberals
wish to renegotiate the contract on behalf of the
ambulance operators, I cannot tell them when they will
be signed now. I am going to want to hear from the
ambulance operators saying that they are happy with this
contract, that they accept the contract and that it is a
contract that they will live with before I sign.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for the District
of Signal Hill-Quidi Vidi.
MS MICHAEL:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
It is my understanding from the
ambulance operators that I have been speaking to, they
have signed their contracts, that means they have
accepted them and they want their cheques.
These ambulance operators have
been working at the end of their ropes for the past
year, some with banks breathing down their necks because
they were waiting for a negotiated agreement. They did
not have adequate money; they have had to take out loans
to operate.
I ask the minister: Can you tell
them that those who have signed their contracts are
going to be able to get these cheques before Christmas?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of Health and
Community Services.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. KENNEDY:
Yes, thank you, Mr. Speaker.
It is my understanding that this
agreement was reached by the Ambulance Operators
Association and that they had a team which met with the
Treasury Board negotiating team. These contracts were
not reached on the basis of well if four or five of you
agree, then the rest of you can choose whether or not to
agree.
What I am hearing today from the
Liberals, they do not appear to be agreement is what I
say to the Leader of the NDP. If these ambulance
operators are not all in agreement, well, I am sorry,
but we cannot reach an agreement with half a group and
leave the other half of the group to come back later.
That is not the way negotiation works.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Member for the District
of Signal Hill-Quidi Vidi.
MS MICHAEL:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I wish the minister had just
responded to my questions, not in relationship to
anybody else’s questions; he spoke to an issue I did not
raise.
Mr. Speaker, other provinces have
streamlined –
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
The Chair has recognized the hon.
the Member for the District of Signal Hill-Quidi Vidi.
The hon. member.
MS MICHAEL:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Others provinces have streamlined
the provision of ambulance services by putting them
under one public umbrella, and this has been very
successful in the provinces where it has happened.
Mr. Speaker, in November, the
Minister of Health and Community Services said in the
media, and it was reported in the media: We may have to
start looking at moving towards-
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
MS MICHAEL:
- the type of ambulance service that
they offer in other provinces where there is not as much
reliance on the private operators.
Mr. Speaker, I ask the minister:
When will this government begin to publicly manage as
well as fund all ambulance services in this Province so
that the same standards of operations and services are
provided to everyone the same in the Province?
MR. SPEAKER:
The hon. the Minister of Health and
Community Services.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. KENNEDY:
Yes, thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I am not aware of the final
details but my understanding there was at least an $8.5
million raise in the contract, the operating, which
amounted to over 20 per cent. In the forefront of the
negotiations was the desire that this money get down to
the people who were working. Now whether or not that has
happened, Mr. Speaker, I do not know.
I have indicated, and I did
indicate during the H1N1 that if the private ambulance
operators could not see fit to reach an agreement or
were going to go on strike in the middle of a pandemic,
then we would have to look at the issue of a private
ambulance system. I do not think, Mr. Speaker, it is an
issue of the underfunding of the system; it is a
question of which system is most efficient and most
effective.
We are pleased to reach a deal
with the ambulance operators, but all we are hearing
from the Opposition is that they do not seem to like the
deal. If they wish to get back to us today, and I hear
from the Ambulance Operators Association, then I will
sign the contracts.
It seems to be ambulance week for
the Liberal member over there -
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
The hon. the Member for the
District of Signal Hill-Quidi Vidi.
MS MICHAEL:
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker, my question to the
minister was relating to something that he said in the
media some weeks ago when negotiations were going on, so
I will put it more clearly to him. What did you mean
when you said that we may have to start looking at
moving toward the type of ambulance service that they
offer in other provinces where there is not as much
reliance on the private operators? Please answer my
question, that is what I am asking, Mr. Speaker.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Oh, oh!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
The hon. the Minister of Health
and Community Services.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. KENNEDY:
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
It is my understanding during this
negotiation there was a significant raise given to these
ambulance operators in their operating costs. It was
very generous and I think it came within the template of
20 to 21 per cent; it might have been higher. The cost,
Mr. Speaker, and I forget the actual numbers, and my
colleague, the Minister of Finance and President of
Treasury Board would be able to outline that, but there
has been a significant increase in the operating costs
that have been provide to these ambulance operators over
a period of time.
It seems to me, Mr. Speaker, that
if they want the money that they have agreed upon, it is
simply a matter of sending an e-mail from the president
of the Ambulance Operators Association to the President
of Treasury Board and myself, and we will certainly get
the money.
I hope that answers the question
for the Member for Signal Hill-Quidi Vidi.
SOME HON. MEMBERS:
Hear, hear!
MR. SPEAKER:
Order, please!
The time allotted for questions
and answers has expired.