House of Assembly
Newfoundland and Labrador

Oral Questions
March 24, 2009

HomeIn the House | Question Period

MS JONES:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

My questions are for the Premier.

In a recent interview with David Patterson, the CEO of Abitibi, on the Business News Network, he stated that the Province bid for the power assets of the company but was outbid by a competitor. Yesterday, the Minister of Natural Resources said that talks had broken off with the company over the amount of compensation to be paid out.

So I ask the Premier today: How much did the Province originally bid for the assets, and why was this information not disclosed when we debated the expropriation legislation in the House of Assembly?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Natural Resources and Deputy Premier.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MS DUNDERDALE: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, some time ago Abitibi Bowater informed the Province that it was considering selling its Star Lake asset and invited the Province to make a bid. The Province through Nalcor did that, Mr. Speaker, and the bid was not accepted, in part due to an agreement they have with their shareholder on Star Lake who has the right of first refusal. It was certainly clear to us that Abitibi really was not interested in selling that asset to the Province. We made a fair bid, it was not accepted and we have moved on. It was not a matter of any great consequence, Mr. Speaker, and we were not trying to hide anything from anybody in terms of our discussions around the expropriation. It was completely new discussion at that point in time.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

The minister indicated yesterday that the government was not prepared to pay $300 million for those assets. Maybe she can tell me what the bid amount was that Nalcor submitted?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Natural Resources.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MS DUNDERDALE: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, negotiations, as I said yesterday, have been going on for a number of weeks. Mr. Patterson in The Globe and Mail some time ago during an interview assigned a value of $300 million to the assets. Obviously, we do not agree with that estimate. Talks have been ongoing until last week. We hope that they will resume again. We are certainly not going to have a public discussion, Mr. Speaker, about our negotiating position. What we will do is try to get the best value we can for the people of Newfoundland and Labrador.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

That was not the question, the question was you put in a bid, the bid is off the table. We want to know what the amount of the bid was.

Mr. Speaker, we know that Abitibi has stated publicly that they will be taking the Province to court under a NAFTA challenge if government does not pay the $300 million. We also know that the company has retained legal counsel in this matter.

I ask the Premier today: Have you been given any further indication that Abitibi will be suing the Province, other than what we are hearing in the media? If so, have any of those details been received by the government?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Natural Resources.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MS DUNDERDALE: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

When we began our talks with AbitibiBowater we were very clear under what conditions we were going to conduct those talks, what the issues were on the table. We can only assume that AbitibiBowater came to the table in good faith and was trying to negotiate in good faith to assign a value to the assets and resolve the issues, the three primary issues that we put on the table.

They always held in reserve the right to a NAFTA challenge. That is their right. We have no indication at this point in time whether they are going to actively pursue that right, but they certainly have the option to do so.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

If there is a NAFTA challenge, the federal government would also have an interest in that case.

I ask the minister: Has there been any discussion or consultation with the federal government on that matter?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Premier.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

PREMIER WILLIAMS: Mr. Speaker, I had a conversation with Minister Stockwell Day some time ago, who indicated that they wished to have a discussion with us about it, and we had a brief discussion about it. They also asked if, in fact, we would be entertaining or having any discussions, or would be prepared to have any discussions with the company, being AbitibiBowater, which, in fact, we have done, so we followed those particular instructions.

We have been talking to federal officials, and it is my understanding as well that the minister has also been talking to federal officials.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

If I could ask: Is the federal government supportive of the position that Newfoundland and Labrador has taken in this case, and would they be going to support us in any court challenge or would it be the opposite?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Natural Resources.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MS DUNDERDALE: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

For the Leader of the Opposition’s information, so that she has an understanding of the process, the federal government is the body that will be charged with dealing with a NAFTA challenge, so it is their responsibility to respond to whatever challenges AbitibiBowater brings forward.

I have had a discussion with the Minister of Natural Resources Canada on this issue. I have had discussions with Minister MacKay on this issue. As well, I have had meetings with Minister Day on this issue. The Premier has said to them, as well as I have been able to reiterate on behalf of government, that we will support them in whatever way is appropriate if a NAFTA challenge is brought forward.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Minister, for that clarification.

Mr. Speaker, there are obvious environmental considerations involved in Abitibi’s operations, whether that be with the mill, the timber or the power development project.

I ask the Premier: What assessments have government done to look at the cost of the cleanup and the restoration of areas that have been affected by environmental damage?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Environment and Conservation.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MS JOHNSON: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, our department is doing an inventory of all of the environmental issues. That could range anywhere from logging camps to bridges and to the mill itself. Certainly, the mill will have to undergo an environmental assessment process through the decommissioning of their mill, as was done in Stephenville. The member can rest assured that all environmental issues will certainly be addressed.

Thank you.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Maybe the minister could also give me the time frame for which you think this assessment will be done.

Mr. Speaker, as a further supplementary, if there are any environmental liabilities that need to be looked after, has government gotten any assurances from Abitibi that they are prepared to accept their financial obligations and responsibilities to ensure that those environmental cleanups take place?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Environment and Conservation.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MS JOHNSON: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

The inventory is actively ongoing. In fact, we have received some information from members of the general public about some items out there, that we were not aware of, and we certainly welcome that. Certainly, we are going to hold Abitibi accountable to the environmental issues that are out there, so you can rest assured they will be addressed.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Yesterday, I asked some questions with regard to potential bankruptcy and what it would mean for severance and pension benefits for workers. I ask the government today: Have they received a breakdown of the amount of severance that is owed to displaced workers at the Grand Falls-Windsor mill?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Natural Resources.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MS DUNDERDALE: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Yes, we are working both with the CEP in gathering that information, as well as some of this information has to be counter checked through the company. We are doing our very best to ensure that we have the right numbers, and we are feeling confident that we are there at this time, Mr. Speaker.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

AbitibiBowater has until tomorrow night to restructure their debt or they will be forced into a bankruptcy position. Yesterday, the minister did not want to talk about hypothetical situations, but the reality is that most of these former employees or displaced workers are already hitting a panic button over this, and I think the minister understands that.

I ask again today: What is government doing to prepare for any fallout if there should be a bankruptcy within the next twenty-four to forty-eight hours? What is the backup plan for government?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Natural Resources.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MS DUNDERDALE: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.


Mr. Speaker, this has been a process that has been ongoing with this company and with the people of the Grand Falls-Windsor region for well over two years. We have, at any time, at any number of times during that period, expected this company to collapse. What we are doing is our due diligence. We have excellent communication with the people in the region, particularly with the unions. We understand what their concerns are. There are direct lines of communication between me and the people in the region, between the chair of the task force and the people in the region, and we have three MHAs in the region who are fully engaged.

We are not going to hit the panic button. We understand what is going on. We understand what is going on in the industry. We are watching very carefully. We understand what all of the circumstances have the possibility of bringing forward, and we are also preparing for a number of eventualities.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.


If the minister’s paycheque was on the line maybe she would be hitting the panic button.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Oh, oh!

MS JONES: Mr. Speaker, let me ask the Minister of Health of Community Services -

AN HON. MEMBER: (Inaudible).

MS JONES: No, she did not. I write my questions myself, Minister Hickey. Who writes yours for you? Who writes yours for you?

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Oh, oh!

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Mr. Speaker, my questions are for the Minister of Health and Community Services.

We know in the Cameron Inquiry that he failed to read his briefing notes and be informed on some very significant issues that were facing cancer patients in the Province. Yesterday, on the news, I was appalled to learn that the minister was not aware that there was a need for dialysis equipment in Labrador West, when they have for two years been raising money in that community, when there have been feature articles in the media about it, and when I have a letter, Mr. Speaker, in my own office asking me for a donation as an MHA. He, as the member for the area, sitting behind –

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

I ask the hon. member to pose her question.

MS JONES: I ask the minister today, Mr. Speaker: How do you expect to provide and allow for confidence to be building in the health care system if you are going to be so out of touch with issues like this one in Labrador West?

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. WISEMAN: Mr. Speaker, what I said yesterday in the media was in response to some questions around dialysis services in Labrador West. What I indicated clearly was that as a health department, as a minister, we had not had any representation from the community at large or from the health authority. We have four health authorities in this Province, I say, Mr. Speaker, and they have a really significant purpose in the delivery of health services in the respective parts of the Province.

The Labrador Grenfell Authority has a responsibility in Labrador and the Northern part of the Island portion of the Province. They, as a part of their planning exercise and a part of their exercise in putting forward to government requests for either funding or support for program initiatives, have not approached our department or me, as the minister, or government in any way, about having dialysis services in Lab City.

You may recall, Mr. Speaker, about a year or so ago I joined my colleague and we opened a new dialysis service in Happy Valley-Goose Bay.

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

I ask the hon. minister to complete his answer.

MR. WISEMAN: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Dialysis services, as a range of other programs that we introduce in a variety of areas of the Province, come about as a result of local regional planning from our health authorities who, in turn, make representation to government.

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Mr. Speaker, dialysis services are required in other areas of the Province as well. I don’t know if the minister is aware of this, but in Port aux Basques, for example, there are people being forced to move out of that area to Corner Brook right now in order to seek dialysis services. So, there are significant gaps in the system.

I ask the minister if he is aware of that particular need and what action will be taken by the department to deal with cases like this.

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. WISEMAN: Mr. Speaker, it is interesting, you know, the question got framed initially in what I knew as a minister. What was interesting is she referenced the Cameron Inquiry. What was really interesting, one of the pivotal turning points identified by Justice Cameron was a Dr. Ejeckam letter in 2003. That 2003 letter happened on their watch, I say, Mr. Speaker. We weren’t in government at that time.

When we start talking about what ministers know and what ministers do not know, at an operational level, as a minister, we would not necessarily have any idea what is happening on a day-to-day basis at an operational level at many of our authorities, so it is a natural, normal process for us to rely on health authorities to identify health needs in respective areas of the Province.

Now, with respect to the issue of Port aux Basques, I met with the council in Port aux Basques last year in Corner Brook. We had a discussion around the issue as I understand it now, some representation of the community as well as the health authority –

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

It is interesting; the minister mentions the Dr. Ejeckam letter. Never let the facts stand in the way of a good story, hey, Minister?

The first, you know, that we had ever seen that letter was when your Premier waved it in the House of Assembly, and you know from that report that it was never, ever submitted –

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Oh, oh!

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

I ask members for their co-operation.

I ask the hon. Leader of the Opposition to conclude her question.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

The Province has lost its only infectious disease specialist, Dr. Bader, and while Eastern Health states that they believe they have secured the services of Dr. Bader on a locum basis, we are hearing from the medical community that is not the case.

I ask the minister: What is the current status of these efforts, and what are you doing to reassure the people of the Province that their health needs are being met, and reassuring their families that (inaudible) infectious control doctor provided for…?

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. WISEMAN: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I will try to be brief, but I do want to thank the member for confirming my point in my earlier question. I thank you very much for that.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. WISEMAN: Just for the benefit of her colleague who sits next to her, we are having discussions. As I understand it, Western Health is having some discussions with representatives from your district about dialysis services in Port aux Basques, which is a follow-up to a discussion that I had with the town as well.

Now, to the next question, the issue of an infectious disease specialist in the Province: As I understand, in the information shared with me as recently as this morning, Dr. Bader is, in fact, available to do some locum coverage. I understand he is available to do some consultation by phone, and he is travelling to the Province periodically, every three or four weeks – or every five weeks, I think it is.

In addition to that, there is another specialist, a former Dr. Bowmer, who is in Newfoundland and Labrador, who comes back for locums as well, and we hope to have the new recruit on the ground –

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Mr. Speaker, if that is the case, I ask the minister: Why did you let the people, who were sick and suffering from AIDS, stand outside on the steps of Confederation Building today trying to advocate for such physicians in this Province, and not go out and provide for them the answers that they were looking for?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. WISEMAN: Mr. Speaker, individual organizations, or individuals themselves, or groups, should take advantage of an opportunity if they want to protest, or lobby, or to have a gathering on Confederation Hill to deliver a message to government. That is their option. I would not discourage that. However, the group, this morning, the AIDS organization, were contacted by my office and indicated that we would be prepared to meet with them. A meeting has been set up with them, so we will be following up directly with them.

I was not available to meet with them this morning; I had earlier commitments. They understood that. I shared that with them, but we have set a date, I think it is April 15 we are getting together. Myself and officials from my department will meet with the organization and we will talk with them about their issues, their concerns.

I understand as well, with respect to the service that is provided to them in their clinic, that Eastern Health had already communicated that to them and that their weekly clinic they have is continuing as we speak.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Obviously there are still some communication problems, I say, Minister.

Minister, back about a year-and-a-half ago you said that you would address home support services in the Province; in fact, you would do a review of those services, the long-term care homes and the personal care homes. In fact, last April you informed me that we could expect a strategy to be completed as early as the fall of 2008. Well, the time has since passed and I ask the minister if you can give me an update on the progress of that report, and when we will see something tabled.

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. WISEMAN: Mr. Speaker, I can report that we are making great progress. We have done a lot of work. There have been a number of people who have been involved in this exercise, and I would like to be in a position in the very near future to make some further announcements to the House. I am sure the people of Newfoundland and Labrador will be quite impressed with the work that we have done and the future direction that we are mapping out for long-term care and community supports in this Province, and in particular the whole home support piece.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Leader of the Opposition.

MS JONES: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Maybe I could ask the minister to give me a list of those people who were consulted, because I have talked to a number of home care agencies who tell me they were not consulted, and also with the Newfoundland and Labrador Home Support Enforcement Agency. Basically, I have been told that there has been one collective presentation on home care. If that is the case, Minister, I ask: Why were you not prepared to work directly with those who are engaged in the front lines of the system and hear their views as well?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. WISEMAN: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

As we have gone through this process – well, I can only speak for the time that I have been minister - during the last two years since I have been in my portfolio, I have had numerous discussions with a variety of not just individuals but organizations who are involved in health services in this Province, whether it is the Regional Health Authorities, agencies who are involved in the direct delivery of services, or individuals themselves who are involved in the direct delivery of services; but, most importantly, numerous individual families and individuals who are receiving home supports themselves have been very much engaged in the discussion.

I make reference particularly to the consultations we have done on healthy aging a few years ago, where we spoke to about 1,000 people, over seventeen communities. I suspect that is probably the most extensive consultation any government has ever done in this Province on any one single issue.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

I ask the hon. minister to conclude his answer.

MR. WISEMAN: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I stand here today quite proud of the consultations and discussions we have had on issues around aging in this Province; 1,000 people in seventeen communities, that is extensive and impressive.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for the District of Port de Grave.

MR. BUTLER: Thank you, Mr. Speaker, a standing ovation.

Mr. Speaker, on March 10 Memorial University released a report calling for an end to the provincial government’s involvement with their presidential selection process. The report was prepared following the Premier and the Minister of Education’s decision to veto the candidate chosen by Memorial’s presidential selection committee.

I ask the minister: Can she give me an update on the present condition of that report? Is it with the Premier, with the provincial Cabinet, or is it being reviewed by the Department of Education?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Education and Government House Leader.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MS BURKE: Mr. Speaker, as Minister of Education, I did receive the report from the ad hoc committee, as the member had suggested. Along with that report and the recommendations in that report there was a request by the Chair of the Board of Regents that we engage in discussions with the Board of Regents regarding that report.

I can say that I have met with the Board of Regents, and they will be outlining what they feel would be an appropriate way to discuss the report. They will be getting back to me with their outline of how they want to engage in discussions by mid-April. So I expect by mid-April I will hear back from the Board of Regents with a plan outlining how they want to proceed with the discussions.

Thank you.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for the District of Port de Grave.

MR. BUTLER: I thank the minister for her answer, Mr. Speaker.

The report recommends that Memorial University’s Board of Regents be given the authority to select a president of Memorial University, as well as its chairperson.

Having listened to her answer, Mr. Speaker, I ask the minister: Would government act to change the existing legislation governing Memorial University such as to accept those recommendations and can we expect such legislation changes taking place before a new president is selected?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Education.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MS BURKE: Mr. Speaker, with regards to the selection for a President of Memorial University, the Chair of the Board of Regents outlined a process that will be followed to select the chair at this time and he laid it out in a very clear, concise manner. It is a very open and transparent process and it is certainly one that government agrees with. So, that process will continue.

What I had been asked and I want to clarify, based on the report from the ad hoc committee that came into government, we were asked to engage in discussions and we will certainly do that. As I said, I met with the Board of Regents as recently as yesterday and they will get back to us about how they want to proceed with discussions. That has been the request that came with that report from the Board of Regents and we certainly will follow up with the Board of Regents.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for the District of Signal Hill-Quidi Vidi.

MS MICHAEL: Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.

My question is for the Minister of Health and Community Services.

Mr. Speaker, yesterday the minister said to the media that he was aware of only one person who needed dialysis in Labrador West, and that was according to the information he had from the health authorities for that area. Just this morning my office has been speaking with three families from Labrador West who have somebody getting dialysis and with different organizations from the area who list the need for dialysis at ten people. Obviously, there is something wrong with how the records are being kept.

Mr. Speaker, recommendations thirty-nine and forty from the Cameron report deal with developing a Province wide electronic medical record system to be developed. Such a system would put in place a data base that would give the minister the full information he would need that would help him determine the health needs of people in this Province. I ask the –

MR. SPEAKER: Order, please!

I ask the hon. member to pose her question.

MS MICHAEL: I ask the minister, Mr. Speaker, will he take immediate action to make sure that these two recommendations in particular be put in place right away to ensure that the needs of the people of this Province are being dealt with?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. WISEMAN: Mr. Speaker, I just want to qualify the member’s introductory comment. The media reported my having said there was one. What I actually said was that I am aware that there are two individuals currently receiving dialysis in an institution. One is now doing it in Corner Brook, wants to return to Labrador West. Another is doing it in St. John’s and wants to return to Labrador West. I was also aware that there are two individuals getting home dialysis in Labrador West. So that was my commentary to the media. I have no control over how they reported it.

Now with respect to the issue, the subject of her question, with respect to the electronic health record. We had indicated in response to the tabling of the Cameron report back in early March that we would be acting on those recommendations. We have already started a process, several years ago, in fact, Mr. Speaker, to move us towards a complete electronic patient information system in the Province.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for the District of Signal Hill-Quidi Vidi.

MS MICHAEL: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Obviously, the system that we have is not adequately working because the people we have spoken to are receiving dialysis but it seems like because they are outside of Labrador West getting it they are not being seen as being from Labrador West, but they are outside because of that.

Mr. Speaker, Labrador West has a population of over 9,000 people who are without a dialysis machine. They all do not need it, we know that, but a population of 9,000 that does not have it in their place. People are making accommodations, even as we sit here today, to move to the Island portion of the Province or to Goose Bay.

We have been hearing the story of Mr. Connors for the past few days through the media. He does not want to have to leave Labrador West but he will need dialysis three times a week and will have to move to Goose Bay.

MR. SPEAKER: Order please!

I ask the hon. member to pose her question.

MS MICHAEL: I ask the minister, Mr. Speaker: Will he commit to having communications with the regional authority for this area to determine putting a dialysis machine in place?

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Minister of Health and Community Services.

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. WISEMAN: Just so the member opposite understands the process in terms of determining where people are now getting dialysis service. We have a complete list. We have 417 people, I think it is, currently receiving dialysis service in the Province. We have a list by name and where they are receiving the service, and our records would indicate their home address. So the information I was sharing came from that database that we would have used to determine– as I shared with you a moment ago, two getting intuitional base and two getting home dialysis. That is where the information would come from.

I would be only too glad to have a conversation after the session today about the ten that you have because I would like to reconcile the names that you have. Obviously, you have ten names there and I appreciate if you gave permission to share those names with me so I can reconcile those ten with those that we have in our database. So I would appreciate that very much.

MR. SPEAKER: Order please!

I ask the hon. minister to conclude his answer.

MR. WISEMAN: Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

With respect to the discussion with the regional health authority, I already started that process, I say, Mr. Speaker, to engage them, to look at dialysis in their region and whether or not the information I am hearing in the public domain –

MR. SPEAKER: Order please!

SOME HON. MEMBERS: Hear, hear!

MR. SPEAKER: The hon. the Member for the District of Signal Hill-Quidi Vidi.

MS MICHAEL: Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.

I am glad to know that the minister has started the discussion. I think the reconciliation is absolutely essential and I will see if I have permission from the people we have spoken to, to give names to you, but I would like to have that conversation.

Thank you.

MR. SPEAKER: The time allotted for questions and answers has expired.

HomeIn the House | Question Period